Judge Mehtas Ruling

Unveiling Google's Illegal Tactics to Preserve Monopoly

Judge Mehta's Ruling

In a groundbreaking ruling, Judge Amit Mehta of the US District Court for the District of Columbia has found Google guilty of antitrust violations. The 277-page ruling alleges that Google has unlawfully maintained its dominance in online search through a series of illicit practices.

Billions in Anti-Competitive Spending

Judge Mehta's ruling cites Google's extensive spending on anti-competitive tactics, including billions of dollars funneled into exclusive deals to keep competitors out of the market. This behavior has stifled innovation and limited consumer choice.

Monopoly Power Abused

The judge's decision asserts that Google has abused its monopoly power to favor its own products and services over those of rivals. This preferential treatment has unfairly disadvantaged competitors and deprived consumers of a fair and competitive marketplace.

Government's Trial Allowed

The ruling further permits the government to proceed with its trial against Google, where it will present evidence to support its allegations of illegal monopolization. This landmark decision signals a major shift in the regulatory landscape and could have significant implications for Google's business practices.